Redesigning book production software

Target User:

Print Manufacturing operators, managers, site leaders, quality control associates and printer vendors

Team:

3 Product Managers

19 Developers

1 UX research contractor - foundational research

1 UX designer

My Role:

UX designer & Research limited to usability testing

Focus Area
  • UX strategy

  • Information Architecture

  • Participatory design sprints

  • Usability testing

Background :

Amazon Books ( Print on Demand) owns 18 print facilities across the globe to print, trim, bind and ship books. The print facilities with 5000+ operators were using 15-year old software to manage and produce books.

Impact:

7.24% increase in book production and $ 10 million annual savings due to reduced wastage

Problem statement

Constrained print book production

counterintuitive interface and poor error detection capabilities of 15-year old print manufacturing software caused operator errors. The software's obsolete architecture prevents integration with modern printing equipment and provides no visibility into our outsourced book production work.

Strategic liability threatening our market position and growth potential

The outdated system results in production delays, material waste, lengthy operator training, and compromised quality control. While our competitors leverage modern manufacturing software, our reliance on this antiquated system is not just an operational headache—it's a strategic liability threatening our market position and growth potential.

User Groups

Solution - UX strategy

Rebuilding a product from ground-up is a rare and once-in-a-decade chance to redefine your product trajectory - not just refine task flows. A focused UX strategy transformed that moment into strategic, build-ready roadmap you can stand behind.

  1. Vision

    Grounded in strategic thinking, we will rebuild print manufacturing software through evidence-driven design, creating intuitive workflows, transparent data, and adaptive automation that will cut waste, accelerate book production, adaptable and delight every stakeholder across the production.


  2. Goals & success metrics

    Purpose

    Business Goal

    User Goal

    Success metrics

    Replace legacy task flows with intuitive task flows that cut time, waste and error

    Maintain baseline book production rate and reduce operation waste

    Print, bind and trim paperback book with fewer mistakes and higher quality

    • Book production rate should be more than or equal to baseline rate.

    • Error rate should be less than 5%

    • Usability rating should be more than 80.


    Turn production data into forward-looking, actionable insights


    • Use data visualization to improve core workflow

    • Adapt and change book production and operator assignments based on predictive analytics

    • Improved book production rate

    • Reduced error rates

    • Improved decision making

    • Forecast accuracy

    Automate repetitive tasks and improve performance with AI-assistant

    Increase book production and lower operational cost

    • Use AI assistant to imrpove workflow, reduce errors, impact of workload and fatigue.

    • Build user trust in AI assisted workflow

    • Improved book production as compared to previous phase rollouts.

    • Reduced quality issues.

    • Human trust score


  3. Roadmap and prioritization

    The roadmap was mainly planned and prioritized to fix the basics, unlock insights and then automate error prone tasks.

    Phase 1 - Print site operators workflow redesigning who are printing, triming and binding books

    Phase 2 - Dashboard redesign to help managers monitor and manage book production

    Phase 3 - Designing intelligent book production workflow


  4. Redesigning task flows with participatory sprints

    I conducted multiple participatory design sprints that put real experts - the users- at the center of every decisions. Instead of presenting mockups for critique, we co-created 15 task flows side-by-side.


  5. Validating designs with users

    I conducted usability test for all 15 proposed task flows. These usability test report helped to build user feedback repository which continously helped us to pivot the project in right direction and refine our roadmap.


Recognition

I was awarded by Books UX studio for 'delivering the result' for critical print manufacturing software which will unblock print book's future expansion.

Design Process


Foundational User research

Before sketching single screen, we needed to understand user needs. The legacy software was patched for years and each stakeholder carried a different story about what "really" slowed production. A foundational research helped us to understand:

  • Understand user needs, core workflows, pain-points and workarounds

  • Find dependencies across diverse user groups

  • Quantify where design efforts would deliver the biggest operational win

To understand the problem space from multiple perspective and cross validate findings, we triangulated user feedback

  1. Contextual inquiry - Shadowed 11 operators to understand real-time interactions

  2. Semi-structured interviews - Interviewed 6 operators and 5 managers to understand goals, constarints, and success metrics

  3. Baseline analytics review - Reviewed help tickets, error logs and production metrics for last 6 months.

Research Insights

The critical research findings was -

  1. User attention is divided between screen and physical task. It is impacted by other factors like peripheral vision, noise, workload, fatigue etc.

  2. Users need help in managing their work across the day.

  3. Users need overview of their task before diving deep into work.


Participatory Design Sprints

The most valuable domain knowledge of 15 year old legacy software lived in operator's muscle memory and manager's workaround shortcuts. Inviting those users into design sprints turned them from 'testers' to 'co-designers'. It helped us to get access to unfiltered expertise, instant validity and shared ownership. In addition to improved design quality, I was able to reduce iteration cycles and handoff designs faster.


Understand - 3 day brainstorming session
  • Lightening talks - Operators, manager and site leaders had five minutes each to "show, not tell" their biggest daily friction to create shared baseline and understand blind-spots in foundational research.

  • Finding opportunity area ( How might we…) - All the stakeholders reviewed pain points and discussed possible opportunity area. After grouping opportunity areas, we were able to understand high-impact problem space.

  • Task flow mapping - The group co-built task flow of entire manufacturing operation, including edge-cases and site-specific use cases.

  • Empathy-building exercise - The team members swap the hats - operators critiqued screens as managers and vice versa.

  • User journey map - I layered all the goals, pint-points, quotes, touch-points, metrics and emotions to visualize high-impact areas



Define
  • User Persona - I distilled foundational research and journey map into user personas outlining goals and needs.

  • Use cases - I catalogued all common use cases, edge cases, error cases and site-specific cases

  • Tenets - I collaborated actively with product managers to revisit tenets which could be used as our guidelines.

  • Success metrics - I reviewed all of the above with product managers to align UX metrics with business metrics.

  • Prioritization Matrix - All the stakeholders helped me to plot use cases on impact vs usage matrix.


Design

The foundation research, brainstorming sessions, defined requirements and users' active participation helped me to move faster on designs.


Launched designs

These designs launched in 18 print sites across North America, Europe, Japan and Australia in phases in 2024. The new software increased book production by 7.24% and saved $ 10 million annually.




Amazon - 2024

UX strategy

Participatory design

Juniper Networks - 2020

Data visualization

Information architeture

Amazon - 2023 - 2024

Human-AI interaction

Usability testing

Copyright ©️ 2025 ; Designed by Kasturi Paranjpe